Table of contents
Many traders are attracted to methods like margin trading and short selling as a way to increase their potential profits. By giving you greater market exposure than the capital in your account, leveraged trading promises tantalising rewards. However, just as it can multiply your gains, it also drastically compounds losses when trades turn against you. Treading carefully is a must.
In this article, we will cover the difference between margin trading and short selling and how to utilise these tools responsibly.
What is margin trading?
Margin trading also referred to as margin funding, allows you to purchase more stocks than you could normally afford. Essentially, your broker lends you additional capital to increase your buying power, taking the shares you buy as collateral.
For example, if you wanted to purchase 500 Adani Port shares at ₹700 each for a total cost of ₹350,000 but only had ₹140,000 cash on hand, margin trading could bridge the gap. Your broker might fund the remaining ₹210,000 on your behalf so you can execute the full order.
Of course, utilising margin exposes you to greater risk. If share prices decline, you could face a margin call from your broker, which requires you to deposit more money to restore the minimum margin levels. The advantage lies in the enhanced leverage – if Adani Port shares instead rose to ₹740, your initial ₹140,000 would gain over 10% in just two days, thanks to the additional market exposure margin provided.
Key benefits of margin trading
1. Increased buying power and ability to capitalise on opportunities
2. Leverage to amplify potential gains
3. Low or no interest costs in efficient margin usage
Risks of margin trading
1. Automatic liquidation if share prices move against you
2. Margin calls requiring further deposits to maintain account minimums
3. Interest expenses reduce net profits on trades
What is short selling?
Short selling is the opposite of margin trading. Instead of buying stocks you can’t normally afford, short selling allows you to short stocks you don’t currently own. Using your margin account, the broker essentially lends your shares to sell immediately, with the obligation that you will buy them back later to return the loaned stocks. If share prices fall as you anticipated, you can repurchase the shares at lower levels, pocketing the difference as profit.
For example, if you expected the price of Reliance shares to decline, you could instruct your broker to short 100 shares at ₹2,800, creating proceeds of ₹280,000 credited to your account. If the price then dropped to ₹2,600 over the next week, you could buy back the 100 shares for only ₹260,000, repaying the loaned shares to your broker and retaining the ₹20,000 price difference as your gain.
Of course, short positions come with significant risk, even more so than margin trading. Theoretically losses can be unlimited if a shorted stock increases dramatically in price instead of falling. Mandatory buy-ins can also generate unexpected losses. Still, used judiciously, short selling can be an effective tool for experienced traders.
Key benefits of short-selling
1. Allows speculating on price declines
2. Useful for hedging existing long positions
3. Potential tax advantages in certain cases
Risks of short-selling
1. Unlimited loss potential if prices rise
2. Mandatory buy-in requirements
3. Difficult to maintain short positions indefinitely
Margin trading vs short selling
Margin trading and short selling spark an endless debate between traders, often confusing newer market participants. At a surface glance, they seem similar – after all, both allow you to trade with more capital than what you hold in your account. Trading on margin and shorting stocks provide leverage, and hand traders increase buying power, offering tantalising profit potential.
However, facilitated leverage can be distinguished from the act of borrowing shares to short stocks. Despite a cursory resemblance, important distinctions exist between margin trading and short selling:
1. Intent behind the trades
The core strategies differ fundamentally – margin trading looks to profit from rising prices, while short sellers attempt to benefit from falling prices. Leveraged margin positions take an implicitly bullish stance on the market, utilising borrowed capital to increase long exposure to expected uptrends. Meanwhile, short sellers thrive during market slides and sluggishness, borrowing shares to sell high, hoping to repurchase low later immediately.
2. Risk profiles
Margin trading risks fixed losses, with account liquidation stopping cascading margin calls. However funded the position, the maximum downside equals the original capital outlay plus accumulated interest. Short positions, however, face theoretically unlimited risk should the borrowed stock shoot upwards dramatically.
While both carry risk well beyond the trader’s contributed capital, uncontrolled short squeezes lack a defined ceiling like margin liquidations. Mandatory buy-ins further muddle risk calculations on the short side.
3. Accessibility
Brokers often restrict short selling to clients surpassing certain account minimums or demonstrating extensive trading experience. Margin access tends to be more democratic and granted more freely with basic eligibility standards around account types and balances. Traders seeking short exposure may be denied without a track record, while those clients could access margin leverage despite novice status.
4. Tax implications
Gains generated from margin trading attract short-term capital gains tax just like regular stock profits. However, short sale gains tax at the reduced securities transaction tax rate instead, advantaging shorter-term traders that rely more on short positions within their overall strategies. Loss set-offs also function slightly differently between the two models.
Hence, despite the ability to enhance buying power and the usage of leverage tying margin and shorts together conceptually, stark contrasts emerge in risk, intent, accessibility, and tax treatment. Traders are wise to approach them independently rather than assuming interchangeability.
Real-world examples
1. Margin trading example
Consider a trader named Priya who expects continued strength in agri-commodities and wishes to buy 250 shares of Cargill India at Monday’s opening price of ₹540 per share. The total purchase cost equals 250 x ₹540 = ₹135,000. However, Priya only has ₹80,000 cash available, so she uses margin funding to bridge the gap. Her broker lends ₹55,000 against her existing account equity to complete the full 250-share order.
Two days later, on Wednesday, Cargill India announced expansion plans, lifting shares to ₹595. Priya sells out her position at a higher price, garnering 250 x ₹595 = ₹148,750 from the sale. After repaying her margin loan, accumulated financing costs, and trading expenses, she pockets a 7% return in just two trading sessions thanks to her margin trading leverage. With the margin loan, she was allowed to make a partial purchase with inferior returns.
2. Short selling example
Now consider trader Rakesh, who believes inflation data will negatively impact fertiliser stocks, making Indian Farmers Fertilizer Cooperative (IFFCO) shares ripe for shorting. The stock currently trades at ₹56, and Rakesh expects it to drop to ₹50 or below. He instructs his broker to short 100 shares of IFFCO on margin, essentially borrowing and immediately selling shares he didn’t yet own. The sale at ₹56 creates ₹5,600 cash credited to Rakesh’s trading account.
Over the next week, Rakesh monitors as IFFCO drifts lower to ₹52. He buys back the 100 shares to return the borrowed stock, repaying his short position with a purchase at the new lower price. Including all costs, Rakesh’s short trade earns him ₹550 in profits with the correctly anticipated price drop from ₹56 to ₹52. Without the ability to short on margin, Rakesh would have been limited to a long-only strategy, unable to capitalise directly on falling share prices.
Conclusion
While attractive for their profit potential, margin trading, and short selling warrant great care. Always pay attention to the risks sloshing around excess trading leverage. Maintain stop losses religiously, size positions appropriately, and continuously monitor market exposure. Consider starting while mastering risk management nuances before increasing aggression. But handled prudently, margin and shorts remain useful arrows in the trader’s financial quiver. Their prudent application can reward those disciplined enough to tap their power responsibly.
FAQs
The main differences lie in the intent, risks, accessibility, and tax implications. Margin trading aims to profit from rising prices, while short selling looks to benefit from falling prices. Short positions also face unlimited theoretical loss potential compared to the fixed risk in margin trading. Brokers often restrict short selling to more experienced traders as well. Lastly, short sale gains are taxed favourably compared to margin trading profits.
Excessive leverage makes you vulnerable to margin calls if share prices decline even slightly. You may then be forced to deposit more funds on short notice to maintain minimum margin account balances. It also expands the losses if the market moves against your position. Finally, you rack up higher interest costs from extended margin usage.
You first borrow shares from your broker to short-sell immediately at the current market price. If the stock price drops as anticipated, you buy back the shares at lower levels to repay the loaned stocks, locking in the difference as your profit. If the price rises instead, theoretical losses in a short position are unlimited.
Brokers allow margin trading for cash, F&O, or commodity accounts. They check minimum account balances and trading activity to sanction limits. In some cases, the Demat/trading account also needs to be 12+ months old. Overall margin access is easier than getting short-selling approval.
Margin trading gains are categorised under short-term capital gains tax, similar to regular equity profits. However, short-selling profits come under the beneficial securities transaction tax regime instead of capital gains tax due to the difference in strategy.